Post by amirmukaddas on Mar 12, 2024 1:46:04 GMT -5
Sites that "satisfy" users rank better , yes. But this index is not always measured in the number of pages browsed, it depends on the search intent. A price comparator or a blog usually gets spotty visits, but they are highly satisfying. On the contrary, turning 20 pages to find information on shipping costs cannot be considered a good indicator of satisfaction. To see what we do when we are not on the SERPs, Google has Chrome available , a very chatty browser. It also has network infrastructures and an infinite number of ways that allow it to observe and pattern user behavior. It can use fingerprinting techniques to "defend itself" but also to observe under the microscope what tiny sample targets or even individual users like. Can a referral link from a very (very) followed Facebook page have positive effects on rankings? Direct/stable effects I would say no but it can have important indirect/unstable effects, comparable to the influence of offline.
Any activity that has repercussions on the CTR of a resource affects the rank , only that it is a momentary influence, which lasts as long as the "most interest" signal lasts, and then vanishes. Is there a case (or more than one) where Denmark Telegram Number Data nofollow backlinks improve rankings? Nofollow by definition blocks the passage of Link Juice. If a link is created with nofollow it won't push, period. Different case if the link is born dofollow and subsequently transforms into nofollow or even disappears. My opinion is that in this case some of the thrust remains. I say this both from having observed some tests done by colleagues, and from a point of logic. The mechanism that algorithms use to evaluate the credibility of a resource tends to emulate the concept of trust that we humans use.
If I stop you on the street and tell you that I'm cool (I'll give myself a link) you don't think that I'm cool, on the contrary you think that I have a nervous breakdown. If at the tram stop you hear two people talking to each other saying that I'm cool (the link comes from a site that isn't mine), you'll tend to consider the information more credible. If it's your university professor who says I'm cool (link from an authoritative site), then maybe you'll believe him without even needing to open the link. Ok, this is the pattern. But what if the university professor dies? Do I become less cool? I say no, at least not immediately and not as much as one would expect with a rigid interpretation of the PR. Sure, you will drop and probably over time the boost will decrease, but IMO not completely.
Any activity that has repercussions on the CTR of a resource affects the rank , only that it is a momentary influence, which lasts as long as the "most interest" signal lasts, and then vanishes. Is there a case (or more than one) where Denmark Telegram Number Data nofollow backlinks improve rankings? Nofollow by definition blocks the passage of Link Juice. If a link is created with nofollow it won't push, period. Different case if the link is born dofollow and subsequently transforms into nofollow or even disappears. My opinion is that in this case some of the thrust remains. I say this both from having observed some tests done by colleagues, and from a point of logic. The mechanism that algorithms use to evaluate the credibility of a resource tends to emulate the concept of trust that we humans use.
If I stop you on the street and tell you that I'm cool (I'll give myself a link) you don't think that I'm cool, on the contrary you think that I have a nervous breakdown. If at the tram stop you hear two people talking to each other saying that I'm cool (the link comes from a site that isn't mine), you'll tend to consider the information more credible. If it's your university professor who says I'm cool (link from an authoritative site), then maybe you'll believe him without even needing to open the link. Ok, this is the pattern. But what if the university professor dies? Do I become less cool? I say no, at least not immediately and not as much as one would expect with a rigid interpretation of the PR. Sure, you will drop and probably over time the boost will decrease, but IMO not completely.